Not yet. Another robbery in a bank back, this time not from a robbery, but due to human error and error assessment. Unauthorized access to personnel taken by someone else is safe. Attacks like these happen more often than you might think. While technologies developed, developed the high, so are criminals, led by their tools for the theft of clean operations of fraud and easiest ways to create fake IDs.
I work in a bank safe as the safest place to store valuables and documents and objects that could protect against certain types of disasters, but the procedure to ensure safe access? A survey conducted in 2002 by the Federal Trade Commission, the above 9 5 million people for the victims of identity theft and fraud fallen. So we put our value in a safe, so we have to pay the rent, but in light of this, is really the safest place?
Many financial institutions are very serious about its customer service and security for their customers. According to Celent site (http://www. Celent. Com / Pr … icTech. Htm) as the best solution are identified in protection against identity fraud, which explore the possibilities of biometric security technology.
Surprisingly, such a move a long time. We live in an era in which space-size PC of yesterday are now the size of a small clock and the Internet can be accessed anywhere, even in the desert. Are elementary schools, children at the age of five using the Fingerprint technology (http://www. PRWEB). Com / rel 199,250 …. Htm. Fingerprint technology has become more accepting of people and is often in conflict, gyms, used dental clinics, defense, schools and other institutions. Why does it take so long for biometric technology to be used in banks?
Biometric technology has always been a bit 'controversial. It is understandable that some people are worried, and everyone in his opinion regarding their technology. There has been concern about what exactly happened and to identify what would happen if someone steals the biometric system for identifying data.
In most cases, there is nothing of use to steal. If one finger are analyzed first, the biometric software encrypts the random selection of binary numbers that would have been useless, someone would scan. Biometrics companies are using algorithms that do not have the industry standard. If a thief to enter the system, would have an inversion algorithm to obtain all information concerning the design, and even then it would only be useless strings of numbers. The acceptance of biometric technologies, it all depends on how you look at a problem if someone thinks not, no technology is that the individual's needs.
The current protocol for accessing a safe deposit box is quite simple, the customer can only open the safe with a key assigned, primary focus of the Bank, and ultimately the customer's signature, or perhaps a PIN or the password from a While art is to remain an employee of the bank and wait until the customer has the time, the bank creates additional burden on the left. With this procedure are possible opportunities
? fraud, illegal transactions
? unauthorized access to foreign Safe
? human error
? Process safety
? Identity Theft
? The signature altered
I did research on technology companies and companies like fingerprints M2SYS Technology, came to Motorolaand NEC. Among them M2SYS site was very helpful and easy to understand and its line of software fingerprint was a product called Bio-Tracker, the fingerprint biometric software that eliminates all possibilities of identity fraud.
Basically, Bio-Tracker and other software fingerprint as follows using a similar procedure, is the data of fingerprints and a photograph of the customer. The fingerprint data is then encoded in a binary random number algorithm software fingerprint and date when a customer calls the bank's security access, he / she steal their finger on a fingerprint scanner. Then the fingerprint software fingerprint with the fingerprint is encrypted and stored in the database when you are scanning, then the bank would only allow the customer, provided that its safety.
I understand how people feel about biometric technology, but we need to look at the positive aspects of the use of this technology or at least learn more about these technologies in order to eliminate misunderstandings and doubts you may have. If we are really close to these biometric software can potentially:
? Elimination of human error
? elimination of identity fraud
? Removing a PIN or password system (not remember)
? Employees save time
? Bring greater efficiency
? Increased security
? provide the opportunity for unauthorized access
Technologies are here to make our lives easier and not additional burdens. Of course, no technology in the world is 100% perfect, but it seems that the companies that these technologies are increasing our security interests are created and make our lives safer. Biometric technology can be used not only to be used when access to the cabinets, but also in banks other area where security is required, or in certain transactions, or employee Clock / out. I firmly believe that we have the possibility of integrating biometric technology to improve the security of our research should be safe. Because in reality, that does not want the peace of mind that comes with the knowledge that their money is safe?
Meta
Powered by Yahoo! Answers