<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LockSAF PBS-001 Personal Biometric  Safe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biometricgunsafestore.com/biometric-gun-safe-store/locksaf-pbs-001-personal-biometric-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biometricgunsafestore.com/biometric-gun-safe-store/locksaf-pbs-001-personal-biometric-safe/</link>
	<description>Biometric Technology Authentication and Access Control</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 12:56:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick P</title>
		<link>http://www.biometricgunsafestore.com/biometric-gun-safe-store/locksaf-pbs-001-personal-biometric-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biometricgunsafestore.com/biometric-gun-safe-store/locksaf-pbs-001-personal-biometric-safe/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I bought this because I wanted a biometric safe that had centralized backup, if you have seen, there is little to adapt this law. I have had for about 3 months. I chose this model B / C there are no reports on the locking mechanism failing, as opposed to a major competitor. The safe was sold to the manufacturer&#039;s website, the price of retail. Delivery from Amazon was not a problem. The registration of two fingerprints was simple, and the unit is very reliable. It is read, not 100% reliable at first to 75% chance of opening a second attempt, still another. And &#039;fast, but not immediately. In addition, it makes a click, as it appears. If you think you need to be able to open a safe, without a sound, light, with an accuracy of 100% (too), and soon, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you have a reliable biometric security that works well, and a backup in case of failure, you will find this perfect.  Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this because I wanted a biometric safe that had centralized backup, if you have seen, there is little to adapt this law. I have had for about 3 months. I chose this model B / C there are no reports on the locking mechanism failing, as opposed to a major competitor. The safe was sold to the manufacturer&#39;s website, the price of retail. Delivery from Amazon was not a problem. The registration of two fingerprints was simple, and the unit is very reliable. It is read, not 100% reliable at first to 75% chance of opening a second attempt, still another. And &#39;fast, but not immediately. In addition, it makes a click, as it appears. If you think you need to be able to open a safe, without a sound, light, with an accuracy of 100% (too), and soon, you will be disappointed. On the other hand, if you have a reliable biometric security that works well, and a backup in case of failure, you will find this perfect.<br />
 Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
